Current issues for the financial community

January 10th, 2012

The continuing Euro crisis and slow growth in western economies versus faster growth in BRIC economies present several strategic challenges.

  • How much should be invested in the faster growing economies and segments?
  • Can one view parts of the UK market as ‘cash cows’ to support this investment?
  • What responses are being made to maintain a growth perspective?
  • How are membership organisations balancing current member needs versus investment in potential member needs?

This is part of a regular conversation we have with Finance Directors – contributions and views always welcome.

Fringe benefits on 17/11/11

November 23rd, 2011

The spark for this discussion amongst Professional Institutes was the tight economic environment and a limited pot for staff awards.

  • Should the limited pot be used to increase pay or fringe benefits?
  • Or, is there scope to rebalance expenditure and offer something more valuable?
  • How much do fringe benefits cost the Institute?
  • Who offers which benefit? And, to whom?
  • What is the staff take-up on common benefits?
  • Are their ways to increase the perception of their value and avoid them being taken for granted?

As always, views and comments appreciated.

CPD discussion at CII

September 8th, 2011

Following an interesting and very interactive discussion, several particpants asked if these conversations could be continued. Some topics of interest are:

  1. Metrics/measures of professional standards.
  2. Communication to members and to the general public to highlight value/benefits.
  3. Metrics of monitoring/baselining.
  4. Measuring e-learning.
  5. Online systems and developments.
  6. International approaches.
  7. Implementing change.

Any views?

Protected: Marketing workshop on 15/7/11 at CIM

July 21st, 2011

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


CPD

June 7th, 2011

There is a general trend towards using output measures of CPD away from input measures. Some benefits of these are:

Input: Simple, easy to understand, low cost, ……

Output: Attempts to measue what CPD intends to achieve, …..

Have you other adavantages or disadvantages to add?

IT/Telecom benchmarking

March 21st, 2011
Some of my favourite benchmarks are:
  • % of FTE with a mobile or smart phone.
  • Ratio of smart phones to total mobile phones.
  • Average annual spend per mobile phone.
  • Average cost of a new desktop.
  • Number of printers per computer.
  • Number of service calls per computer.
  • Number of vendors.

What are your favourite IT/Telecom benchmarks?

Governance

January 10th, 2011

There has been a general trend towards making governance more business-like and less onerous on volunteers. But, what catalyses a governance review in your organisation? A new leader, a board review, a financial problem, an external shock, frustration or something else?

Web 2.0 discussion at RICS

October 18th, 2010

One of the challenges that web 2.0 developments face is how to justify investments – at the heart of this challenge is identifying sources of value. Some sources of value that Institutes have achieved (or are close to achieving) are:

  1. Expected growth in membership through increasing engagement. there are many quantitative measures on engagement and volume of traffic. Their value rests on the assumption that increasing membership engagement will increase membership  – be it retention rates or recommendations to join.
  2. Cost reduction through more effective governance and consultations. Examples include less face-to-face Governance meetings and using a wiki to consult with members.
  3. Revenue generation through raising visibility on search engines. Mentions on web 2.0 are important to Google’s rankings and achieving the first page of search results. There are quantitative measures on key words used by visitors and % coming from search engines in the case studies.  Value here rests on the assumption that increasing the number of visitors to your website will increase sales of your products or services; this is similar to an assumption used in the retail sector  – that the sales at an individual store is related to the number of people walking past that store. 
  4. Advertising is the major source of revenue in the commercial sector and, while there are issues about using this in the Institutional sector, several Institutes have raised revenue from corporate sponsorship of videos.
     
  5. Contextual linking can highlight the value of membership, communicate it and reduce lapse/churn rate. The role model is an Amazon book search where the visitor receives additional suggestions based on what other customers bought or based on their previous visits. Value comes from the Institution having more opportunities to show the member services that are relevant to that individual and this reduces the chances of them leaving the Institute. 
  6. Developing direct links between web 2.0 activities and some revenue generating activity.  Institutes could Tweet a special offer on an event and note how many are booked. Dell, for example, are reported to have made $3.5mn in 6 months by sending tweets on special offers.
  7. Content creation could be important. Wikipedia is a well known example. Potentially, this knowledge could be developed and packaged into a commercial offering in the future.

 Have you more examples of how value has (or can be) achieved?

Benchmark Partnership

September 21st, 2010

We have facilitated a Benchmark Partnership of 10 non-competing Institutes for 6 years and have recently been asked if we could facilitate a second Partnership.

Topics covered are determined by the partners involved but could include:

  • Costs savings (eg credit card fees, membership subscription process, employees fringe benefit package).
  • Key statistics over time (eg membership numbers, revenues, staff numbers).
  • Development opportunities (eg web 2.0, International, influencing policy).
  • Modernising Governance (eg Comittee structure, delegated authorities).
  • Improving performance (eg projects, appraisals, bonus schemes).

 

If you have an interest in joining such a Partnership, please send us an email or give us a phonecall.

Practical interaction between staff and Trustees

August 20th, 2010

There is little practical guidance in the public domain on the practical interaction between trustees and staff. ‘Better’ interactions and better ‘teaming’ between trustees and staff can substantially improve the effectiveness of the Charity in delivering its strategy and mission. 

After discussions with four large, high performing charities (with over 100 paid staff each), we are drafting some guidance notes. This guidance aims to help trustees and staff of large charities apply good practice to governance and management and jointly make their charity more successful. It could be a starting point for a process in which trustees and staff discuss, agree and potentially document the appropriate guidelines for their own charity.

We would be very interested to hear from professional managers at other large charities of their experiences.